Impacto de un Heart Team en pacientes con estenosis aórtica candidatos a reemplazo percutáneo / Impact of a Heart Team in patients with aortic stenosis who are candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement

RESUMEN La difusión del reemplazo valvular aórtico percutáneo (TAVI) en la estenosis aórtica (EAo) generó la creación de un Heart Team (HT), para elegir el mejor tratamiento. Existen pocos reportes sobre su utilidad. Objetivos: analizar los resultados del tratamiento de los pacientes con EAo evaluados por un HT durante 10 años Material y métodos: Inclusión consecutiva de todos los pacientes con EAo candidatos a TAVI entre enero del 2012 y julio del 2021 para seleccionar el mejor tratamiento, incluyendo además Cirugía de reemplazo valvular aórtico (CRVA) y Tratamiento médico conservador (TMC). Resultados: De 841 pacientes, se asignaron a TAVI 455 (53%), CRVA 213 (24%) y TMC 183 (23%). El porcentaje asignado a TAVI aumentó con el tiempo de 48 a 62% (p < 0,05). Los pacientes que fueron a TAVI, con respecto a los enviados a CRVA, eran mayores (86 ± 7 vs 83 ± 7 años), con mayor EUROSCORE II (6,2, IC95% 5,7-6,6 vs 5,6, IC95% 4,4-6,5) y más frágiles (1,62 ± 1 vs 0,91 ± 1), en todos los casos p <0,01. La sobrevida actuarial (IC 95%) a 1 y a 2 años fue, para TAVI 88% (84-91%) y 82% (77-86%), para CRVA 83% (76-88%) y 78% (70-84%) y para TMC 70% (60-87%) y 59% (48-68%) respectivamente (p <0,001). Conclusiones: Durante los primeros 10 años de establecido un Heart Team para la toma de decisiones en EAo, se asignaron a TAVI aproximadamente la mitad y el resto se asignó por mitades a cirugía u observación. La sobrevida de los pacientes intervenidos fue similar a 2 años y mayor que la de los no intervenidos.

ABSTRACT As transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for aortic stenosis (AS) became widespread, the need for a Heart Team (HT) arose to choose the best treatment. There are few reports regarding its usefulness. Objectives: To analyze treatment outcomes in patients with AS evaluated by a HT for 10 years. Methods: Consecutive enrollment of all patients with AS who were candidates for TAVI between January 2012 and July 2021 to choose the best treatment, including surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and conservative medical management (CMM). Results: Out of 841 patients, 455 were assigned to TAVI (53%), 213 to SAVR (24%), and 183 to CMM (23%). The percentage assigned to TAVI has increased from 48% to 62% over time (p <0.05). Patients who underwent TAVI versus those who underwent SAVR were older (86 ± 7 vs. 83 ± 7 years), had a higher EUROSCORE II (6.2, 95% CI 5.7-6.6 vs. 5.6; 95% CI 4.4-6.5) and were frailer (1.62 ± 1 vs. 0.91 ± 1), in all cases p <0.01. Actuarial survival (95% CI) at 1 and 2 years was 88% (84-91%) and 82% (77-86%) for TAVI, 83% (76-88%) and 78% (70-84%) for SAVR, and 70% (60-87%) and 59% (48-68%) for CMM, respectively (p <0.001). Conclusions: For the first 10 years after a Heart Team was established for AS decision-making, approximately half of the patients were assigned to TAVI, and the rest were equally assigned in halves to either surgery or observation. Survival for patients who received interventions was similar at 2 years and higher than in those who did not.

Cirugía de revascularización coronaria sin bomba con 2 arterias mamarias en la enfermedad del tronco ¿genera beneficio en la mortalidad a 10 años? / Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery with Bilateral Internal Mammary Arteries in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. Is There Any Benefit in 10-Year Mortality?

RESUMEN Introducción: Los ensayos clínicos aleatorizados que compararon la cirugía de revascularización miocárdica (CRM) con la angioplastia transluminal coronaria (ATC) incluyeron todo tipo de técnicas quirúrgicas (con y sin bomba de circulación extracorpórea) y diversos conductos (arteriales y venosos). ¿Es razonable suponer que todas las técnicas quirúrgicas son iguales en términos de mortalidad tardía? Objetivos: Evaluar si la CRM sin circulación extracorpórea y con el empleo de ambas arterias mamarias tiene un beneficio adicional a la revascularización convencional utilizando una sola arteria mamaria en términos de sobrevida a largo plazo para la enfermedad del tronco de la coronaria izquierda (TCI). Material y métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo comparativo (n = 723) ajustado por riesgo. Se realizó análisis estratificado según el uso de arteria mamaria interna única (SITA, n = 144) o ambas arterias mamarias internas (BITA, n = 579). Se analizó la sobrevida a los 10 años de la intervención. Resultados: La supervivencia a los 10 años fue significativamente mayor en el grupo en que se utilizaron ambas arterias mamarias (79,0% ± 3,4% vs 67,0% ± 4,9%, log-rank test, p <0,01). Este beneficio también se observó en el análisis ajustado por riesgo (93,0% ± 4,6 vs 69,0% ± 5,7 respectivamente, p = 0,03). El uso de ambas arterias mamarias fue un predictor independiente de sobrevida a 10 años (HR 0,57, IC 95% 0,37-0,87; p = 0,01). Conclusión: El uso de ambas arterias mamarias internas en pacientes con enfermedad del tronco coronario izquierdo sometidos a revascularización coronaria sin circulación extracorpórea se asoció con mayor sobrevida a los 10 años.

ABSTRACT Background: The randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) included all types of surgical techniques (on-pump and off-pump) and different conduits (arterial and venous). Is it reasonable to assume that all surgical techniques are equal in terms of late mortality? Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether off-pump CABG surgery using both mammary arteries provides additional benefit over conventional revascularization using single mammary artery in terms of long-term survival for left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational and comparative study (n=723) adjusted for risk. A stratified analysis was performed according to the use of single internal thoracic artery (SITA, n=144) or bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA, n=579) analyzing survival at 10 years after the intervention. Results: Survival at 10 years was significantly higher in BITA group (79.0%±3.4% vs 67.0%±4.9%, log-rank test, p <0.01). This advantage was also observed in the risk-adjusted analysis (93.0%±4.6 vs 69.0%±5.7 respectively, p=0.03). The use of BITA was an independent predictor of 10-year survival (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37-0.87, p=0.01). Conclusion: The use of bilateral internal mammary arteries in patients with left main coronary artery disease undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting was associated with higher survival at 10 years.

Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in elderly patients: Any benefit in survival?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to compare survival outcomes in propensity score-matched patients aged 70 years or greater receiving a bilateral internal thoracic artery graft with patients receiving a single internal thoracic artery graft. METHODS: Among 4083 consecutive patients with isolated coronary artery bypass grafting who underwent operation between January 2001 and December 2018, we identified 1300 patients aged 70 years or greater; of these, 968 received a bilateral internal thoracic artery (bilateral internal thoracic artery group) and 332 received a single internal thoracic artery (single internal thoracic artery group). Propensity score matching was used to reduce the preoperative patient differences. The 10-year survival and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: A Kaplan-Meier curve at 10 years of follow-up showed that crude survival was significantly superior in patients with bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts than in patients with single internal thoracic artery grafts (67.0% ± 2.5% vs 56.0% ± 3.4%, respectively; P < .016). In the actuarial survival, estimates for propensity score-matched patients with a bilateral internal thoracic artery showed a significantly higher rates of survival than patients with a single internal thoracic artery by the end of follow-up (66.0% ± 5.3% vs 53.0% ± 3.9%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.94; P = .022, univariable Cox Model and multivariable analysis hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.97; P = .036 Cox model). Postoperative complications were all similar between the single internal thoracic artery and bilateral internal thoracic artery groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in older patients improves 10-year survival, with similar postoperative morbidity. This surgical technique might have beneficial effects in survival in patients aged more than 70 years. Its use could be considered more frequently.

Durabilidad a largo plazo de la cirugía reparadora de la válvula mitral con insuficiencia de tipo degenerativo / Long-term Durability of Mitral Valve Repair Surgery for Degenerative Regurgitation

RESUMEN Introducción: El objetivo del estudio es evaluar los resultados alejados de la reparación de la válvula mitral (VM) con insuficiencia de tipo degenerativo. Material y Métodos: Entre enero 2008 y diciembre 2019 se efectuó cirugía reparadora de la VM en 457 pacientes con insuficiencia mitral grave (IM). La edad promedio fue 64,9 ± 12,2 años, y 61,1% eran de sexo masculino. El seguimiento clínico mediana 3,0 (RIC 4,1 años) se completó en el 98,7% de los pacientes. Se efectuaron estudios ecocardiográficos de seguimiento en forma periódica, se analizó la sobrevida, la recurrencia de IM moderada-grave en forma global y según el tipo de valva afectada, y la necesidad de re intervención en el seguimiento alejado. Resultados: A 10 años de seguimiento la sobrevida alejada fue elevada sin diferencias significativas según la valva afectada: valva posterior 95 ± 2,1%, y valva anterior 94 ± 2,2% (p=0,54). El grupo de pacientes con clase funcional preoperatoria III/IV (n = 142) presentó mayor mortalidad al seguimiento: 13,9 ± 4,1% vs. 2,7% ± 1,2% (p = 0,001). El porcentaje de recurrencia de IM moderada-grave al finalizar el seguimiento para el grupo total de pacientes fue del 14,6 ± 4,3% y el periodo de libertad de recurrencia según valva afectada fue elevado sin diferencia significativas: valva posterior 90 ± 3,4% y valva anterior 80 ± 8,5 (p = 0,97). Por último, la necesidad de reintervención en el seguimiento post reparación fue del 4,7 ± 3,3 % Conclusiones: la sobrevida alejada post reparación de IM es elevada y la necesidad de reintervención poco frecuente. Existe un aumento progresivo en la recurrencia de IM en el seguimiento alejado.

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term results of degenerative mitral valve regurgitation (MR) repair. Methods: Between January 2008 and December 2019, 457 patients (mean age 64.9±12.2 years; 61.1% men) with severe MR underwent MV repair surgery. Median follow-up was 3.0 years (IQR 4.1 years) and was completed in 98.7% of patients. Periodic echocardiographic studies were performed, and long-term survival, the recurrence rate of moderate-severe MR and the need for reintervention were analyzed. Results: At 10-year follow-up, long-term survival was high without significant differences according to the affected leaflet: between posterior leaflet 95±2.1%, and anterior leaflet 94±2.2% (p=0.54). Patients with preoperative functional class III/IV (n=142) presented higher mortality at follow-up: 13.9±4.1% vs. 2.7%±1.2% (p=0.001). The risk of recurrence for moderatesevere MR at the end of follow-up for the total group of patients was 14.6±4.3% and freedom from recurrence according to the affected leaflet was high without significant difference: posterior leaflet 90±3.4% and anterior leaflet 80 ± 8.5 (p=0.97). Finally, the need for reoperation in post-repair follow-up was 4.7±3.3% Conclusions: Long-term survival after MV repair is high and the need for reoperation is infrequent. There is a progressive increase in MR recurrence at the long-term follow-up.

Prognostic Value of the Leuko-Glycaemic Index in the Postoperative Period of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Abstract Introduction: High leuko-glycaemic index (LGI) (> 2000) has been associated with poor prognosis in many critical care settings. However, there is no evidence of LGI's prognostic value in the postoperative period of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study aims to analyze the prognostic value of LGI in the postoperative period of CABG. Methods: Single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. Consecutive adult patients undergoing CABG between 2007 and 2019 were included. Blood glucose levels and white blood cells count were evaluated in the immediate postoperative period. LGI was calculated by multiplying both values and dividing them by 1,000 and analyzed in quartiles. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the best cutoff value. The primary combined endpoint was in-hospital mortality, low cardiac output (LCO), or acute kidney injury (AKI). Secondary endpoints included in-hospital death, AKI, atrial fibrillation, and LCO. Results: The study evaluated 3,813 patients undergoing CABG (88.5% male, 89.8% off-pump surgery, aged 64.6 years [standard deviation 9.6]). The median of LGI was 2,035. Presence of primary endpoint significantly increased per LGI quartile (9.2%, 9.7%, 11.8%, and 15%; P<0.001). High LGI was associated with increased occurrence of in-hospital mortality, LCO, AKI, and atrial fibrillation. The best prognostic cutoff value for primary endpoint was 2,000. In a multivariate logistic regression model, high LGI was independently associated with in-hospital death, LCO, or AKI. Conclusion: High LGI was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality, LCO, or AKI in postoperative period of CABG. It was also associated with higher in-hospital death.

Prognostic Value of the Leuko-Glycaemic Index in the Postoperative Period of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

INTRODUCTION: High leuko-glycaemic index (LGI) (> 2000) has been associated with poor prognosis in many critical care settings. However, there is no evidence of LGI's prognostic value in the postoperative period of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study aims to analyze the prognostic value of LGI in the postoperative period of CABG. METHODS: Single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. Consecutive adult patients undergoing CABG between 2007 and 2019 were included. Blood glucose levels and white blood cells count were evaluated in the immediate postoperative period. LGI was calculated by multiplying both values and dividing them by 1,000 and analyzed in quartiles. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the best cutoff value. The primary combined endpoint was in-hospital mortality, low cardiac output (LCO), or acute kidney injury (AKI). Secondary endpoints included in-hospital death, AKI, atrial fibrillation, and LCO. RESULTS: The study evaluated 3,813 patients undergoing CABG (88.5% male, 89.8% off-pump surgery, aged 64.6 years [standard deviation 9.6]). The median of LGI was 2,035. Presence of primary endpoint significantly increased per LGI quartile (9.2%, 9.7%, 11.8%, and 15%; P<0.001). High LGI was associated with increased occurrence of in-hospital mortality, LCO, AKI, and atrial fibrillation. The best prognostic cutoff value for primary endpoint was 2,000. In a multivariate logistic regression model, high LGI was independently associated with in-hospital death, LCO, or AKI. CONCLUSION: High LGI was an independent predictor of inhospital mortality, LCO, or AKI in postoperative period of CABG. It was also associated with higher in-hospital death.

Hemodynamically significant prosthesis-patient mismatch can be predicted and is associated with early prosthetic valve dysfunction in aortic bioprosthesis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of predicted prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) regarding actual PPM measured postoperatively. To assess the association between PPM and prosthetic valve dysfunction. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including adult patients after aortic valve replacement surgery with a biological prosthesis. Predicted PPM status was determined using mean reference effective orifice area indexed to total body surface (iEOA), without considering reference standard deviations. Postoperative PPM status was determined by measuring iEOA within the first 60 postoperative days. Prosthetic valve dysfunction was defined as thrombosis, pannus, valve degeneration, and/or disruption. RESULTS: 205 patients were enrolled between January 2003 and June 2017: predicted PPM was absent in 52 patients (25.4%), moderate in 137 patients (66.8%), and severe in 16 patients (7.8%). After surgery, the actual postoperative iEOA was measured: 53 (25.9%) did not have PPM, 73 had moderate PPM (35.6%), and 79 had severe PPM (38.5%). Predicted PPM identified the presence of hemodynamically significant actual postoperative PPM (OR = 2.56; 95%CI 1.30-5.05; P = .006), though not its degree of severity. Prosthetic valve dysfunction was more frequent among patients with hemodynamically significant PPM (53.9% vs. 11.3%; P < .001), compared to those without PPM. The association between PPM and prosthetic valve dysfunction was maintained after adjusting for gender, age, and ever-smoking (OR = 9.03; P < .001). The incidence of thrombosis or pannus was also nonsignificantly higher in patients with moderate or severe PPM. CONCLUSIONS: Predicted PPM identifies the presence, possibly not the severity, of actual postoperative PPM. Moderate or severe PPM is associated with prosthetic valve dysfunction. Actual postoperative prosthesis-patient mismatch measured within 60 postoperative days showed a distinctive hemodynamic profile and presented a stronger association with prosthetic valve dysfunction than predicted prosthesis-patient mismatch. A. Echocardiographic follow-up in patients according to the actual postoperative PPM measured within 60 postoperative days. B. Prediction of prosthetic valve dysfunction based on preoperative predicted PPM or on actual postoperative PPM within 60 postoperative days. PPM: prosthesis-patient mismatch. OR: Odds ratio.

Cirugía de preservación valvular como alternativa en enfermedad de la raíz aórtica / Aortic Valve Sparing Surgery as Alternative in Aortic Root Disease

RESUMEN Introducción: Desde 1968, la enfermedad aneurismática de la raíz aórtica ha sido tratada mediante el remplazo con tubo valvulado. En las últimas décadas la cirugía de preservación valvular surgió y evolucionó como una opción al remplazo protésico. Objetivo: Reportar la experiencia institucional en la técnica de preservación valvular y sus resultados a largo plazo. Material y métodos: Revisión de 116 casos consecutivos con criterios de reparabilidad, intervenidos entre 2005 y 2019. Previo ecocardiograma transesofágico (ETE) y angiotomografía (AngioTC), se procedió quirúrgicamente acorde a la clasificación anatomofuncional, con la combinación de técnicas. Se realizó control intraoperatorio y conversión a remplazo según el criterio del cirujano interviniente. Se reportan las variables intraoperatorias, la morbimortalidad intrahospitalaria y la mortalidad, la libertad de insuficiencia valvular significativa y la reoperación en el seguimiento clínico y ecocardiográfico. Resultados: La edad media era 56 ± 15,6 años, varones 73%, 59% asintomáticos, intervenidos por diámetro aórtico (52 ± 11,7 mm) o progresión de valvulopatía. En el posprocedimiento, 4% de los casos resultó con insuficiencia leve o nula y 2 conversiones (1,7%); mortalidad hospitalaria 0,9%. A 10 años de seguimiento, sobrevida actuarial del 88% y libertad de insuficiencia significativa (moderada/grave) 79%. Se reintervinieron 5 casos, a un intervalo promedio de 9,1 años, libertad de reoperación de 90% a 10 años. No se registraron eventos tromboembólicos ni hemorrágicos mayores. Conclusión: las técnicas de preservación valvular aórtica, en contexto de enfermedad de la raíz, resultan una opción factible, segura y estable en el tiempo.

ABSTRACT Background: Since 1968, ascending aorta replacement with a valved conduit has been the standard practice for aortic root aneurysm. By the end of the 20th century, aortic valve sparing operation emerged and evolved as an alternative to aortic valve replacement. Objective: The aim of this study was to report our experience with aortic valve sparing technique and its long -term outcomes. Methods: A total of 116 consecutive cases with criteria of repairability operated on between 2005 and 2019 were analyzed. Preopera- tive transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) were used in combination to determine the aortic phenotype based on a previous anatomical and functional classification. Perioperative control was performed and conver- sion to aortic valve replacement was left to the discretion of the attending surgeon. Intraoperative variables, in-hospital morbidity and mortality, freedom from significant aortic regurgitation (AR) and reoperation in the clinical and echocardiographic follow-up were reported. Results: Mean age was 56±15.6 years and 73% were men; 59% were asymptomatic, and the reason for the intervention was the aortic diameter (52±11.7 mm) or progression of AR. After the procedure, 4% of the cases presented mild or trivial AR and 2 patients required conversion to aortic valve replacement (1.7%). In hospital mortality was 0.9%. Actuarial survival was 88% at 10 years, and 79% were free from significant (moderate/severe) AR. Five cases underwent reoperation after a mean interval of 9.1 years and free- dom from reoperation at 10 years was 90%. There were no major thromboembolic or bleeding events. Conclusion: Aortic valve sparing technique in the setting of aortic root disease is a feasible and safe option, and stable over time.

Off-pump bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting - surgical technique.

Numerous coronary revascularization studies have documented superior results associated with bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting compared with single internal thoracic artery grafting. However, concerns about perioperative complications and the technical challenges inherent in bilateral grafting limit its broad utilization. In this video tutorial we show our routine technique for off-pump bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting, and also discuss the experience of our department and the evolving process of how we have performed myocardial revascularization over the past two decades.

Isolated bicuspid aortic valve repair with double annuloplasty: The French approach.

Isolated aortic valve repair is an alternative to aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic regurgitation. It reduces the risk of prosthesis-related complications, such as thromboembolism and endocarditis, and there is no need for long-term oral anticoagulation. However, repair techniques are technically demanding, especially in bicuspid aortic valves.

Acute penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of the ascending aorta.

A 67-year-old man presented with chest pain. Clinical examination revealed hypertension (160/90 mm Hg). Electrocardiogram indicated no acute coronary syndrome and cardiac enzymes were normal. Catheterization was performed owing to the patient's continuing chest pain and ascending aortogram revealed irregular aortic wall. A computed tomography image showed the shape of penetrating ulcer. The patient was taken to the operating room and intraoperative examination confirmed the diagnosis of penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU). Coronary artery bypass graft and bovine pericardial patch repair of PAU was performed. A bovine pericardial patch was done as aortic root was heavily calcified and was easy to handle and more hemostatic.

Is sex a risk factor for death in patients with bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts?

BACKGROUND: Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been reported to be higher in women. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting in women has a long-term survival benefit over single internal thoracic artery grafting, possibly equivalent to the male population. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of our prospectively collected database. We included 4406 consecutive patients who underwent isolated CABG, who received their operation between January 2000 and April 2017. From the entire series, 2979 patients (67.6%) received exclusively BITA grafts; 299 (10.1%) were female. The primary end point was follow-up mortality, independently from cause. In-hospital mortality and during follow-up were analyzed. Substratification according to age was performed to answer whether it has an effect. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses was performed to investigate the significant predictors of late mortality. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 5.1 ± 3.9 years. Female BITA patients were older (P < .001), had nonelective surgery (P < .001), more on-pump CABG (P = .015), fewer number of grafts (P < .001) versus male BITA patients. BITA grafting in women had a long-term survival equivalent to that of men (P = .784). In a Cox proportional hazard model, female sex was not an independent risk factor for late death (B, -0.303; hazard ratio, 0.739; 95% confidence interval, 0.470-1.16; P = .189). The stratification analysis showed that the beneficial effect of BITA remained similar among sexes and was not modified by age even after adjusting for confounders. In a risk-adjusted sample, patients older than 65 years with BITA grafting showed superior long-term survival than those with single internal thoracic artery grafting (P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: Although there are some differences between sexes, BITA grafting in women was associated with similar 10-year survival compared with men, and female sex was not an independent risk factor for late death. Among women, the BITA group had better survival, especially those older than 65 years.

Surgical Treatment of Dysphagia Lusoria Caused by Right-Aortic Arch with Kommerell Diverticulum: Left Heart Bypass without Subclavian Revascularization.

The authors present the case of a 26-year-old patient suffering from dysphagia because of compression by a Kommerell diverticulum in right aortic arch anomaly. Open surgical arch and descending aorta replacement with left heart bypass without left subclavian artery reimplantation was performed.

Aneurisma de aorta ascendente: ¿cuál es el riesgo de reemplazar la raíz? / Ascending Aorta Aneurysm: What is the Risk of Replacing the Aortic Root?

RESUMEN Introducción: El riesgo-beneficio del reemplazo de los senos de Valsalva con el consiguiente reimplante coronario frente a la alternativa de mantenerlos, cuando hay dilataciones moderadas de la raíz, es un tópico que se debe definir. Objetivo: Analizar la morbimortalidad posoperatoria y a largo plazo en pacientes sometidos a reemplazo de la raíz aórtica comparados con aquellos en los que se han respetado los senos de Valsalva. Material y métodos: Entre 2002 y 2016, a 426 pacientes se les realizó reemplazo de aorta ascendente. Tras excluir de esa población las cirugías de urgencia, las aortopatías genéticas (excepto bicúspide), las reoperaciones y las cirugías del arco, se conformó una población de 259 pacientes. En 99 de ellos (38,2%) se reemplazó la aorta ascendente conservando la raíz; estos pacientes fueron comparados con los 160 (61,8%) pacientes restantes, en quienes se reemplazaron los senos de Valsalva. Resultados: El grupo en el que se preservó la raíz fue más añoso, con más mujeres, con un Euroscore mayor, con mayor incidencia de válvula bicúspide y enfermedad coronaria. El tiempo de circulación extracorpórea fue mayor en el grupo en el que se reemplazó la raíz. La mortalidad hospitalaria no fue diferente (1% para la conservación de raíz vs. 3,1% para el reemplazo de los senos de Valsalva (p = 0,272). En el análisis multivariado, el tiempo de circulación extracorpórea fue predictor de mortalidad posoperatoria. La sobrevida a 8 años no mostró diferencias significativas entre grupos. En el seguimiento, ningún paciente requirió reoperación debido a complicaciones de la aorta. En el análisis multivariado, la edad y la presencia de enfermedad valvular mitral fueron predictores de mortalidad alejada. Conclusión: El reemplazo de la aorta ascendente, ya sea reemplazando la raíz o respetando los senos de Valsalva, es una cirugía segura, con baja morbimortalidad hospitalaria. A largo plazo, la preservación de los senos de Valsalva no se asocia con más eventos ni con mayor mortalidad.

ABSTRACT Background: In mildly dilated aortic root, the cost-benefit of replacing of the sinuses of Valsalva with reimplantation of the coronary arteries or preserving them is still a matter of debate. Objective: The goal of this study was to analyze the postoperative and long-term morbidity and mortality of patients undergo-ing aortic root replacement versus aortic root surgery with sinuses of Valsalva preservation. Methods: Between 2002 and 2016, 426 patients underwent replacement of the ascending aorta. After excluding patients under-going urgent procedures, genetic aortic diseases (except for bicuspid aortic valve), reoperations and surgery of the aortic arch, the cohort was made up of 259 patients. In 99 of them (38.2%) the ascending aorta was replaced, preserving the aortic root; these patients were compared with the remaining 160 (61.8%) patients who underwent replacement of the sinuses of Valsalva. Results: Patients undergoing preservation of the aortic root were older, had higher percentage of female sex, higher EuroSCORE and with greater incidence of bicuspid aortic valve and coronary artery disease. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was longer in the group undergoing aortic root replacement. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality between both groups (1% in the group with preservation of the aortic root vs. 3.1% for replacement of the sinuses of Valsalva, p=0.272). Multivariate analysis showed that cardiopulmonary bypass was a predictor of in-hospital mortality. Survival at 8 years was similar in both groups. There were no new operations due to complications in the aorta during follow-up. At multivariate analysis, age and mitral valve disease were identified as predictors of long-term mortality. Conclusion: Replacement of the ascending aorta, either replacing the aortic root or preserving the sinuses of Valsalva, is a safe procedure, with low in-hospital mortality. Preservation of the sinuses of Valsalva is not associated with greater rate of events or mortality at the long-term.